<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ll take gems in my coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.elisehuard.be/2007/04/ill-take-gems-in-my-coffee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.elisehuard.be/2007/04/ill-take-gems-in-my-coffee/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 20:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier</title>
		<link>http://blog.elisehuard.be/2007/04/ill-take-gems-in-my-coffee/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.elisehuard.be/?p=20#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Django looks cool from a Python perspective but all things equals, it&#039;s more verbose (and less DRY) than RoR.  

If I was coerced into using Python, I&#039;d most certainly go for Django over TurboGears or web.py.

I was so in love with Python back in the days!  
I used to find its syntax cleaner than Ruby which had too many syntactic sugar but Rails changed the game.  It&#039;s the first framework that leverages its host language to focus on beauty.  Rails just turns all that raw sugar into nicely packaged yummy candies! :)

As far as scalability is concerned, it&#039;s an happy problem.  You can always address it by narrowing down the bottlenecks and optimize them.  Hardware is cheap, clean code produced by happy people is priceless.

I like DHH&#039;s very down to earth approach to tackle performance issues : http://www.infoq.com/interviews/David-Hansson

Rails is of course no silverbullet... it&#039;s simply the most enjoyable and self-rewarding way to write database-driven web apps at this point in time so let&#039;s just enjoy it! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Django looks cool from a Python perspective but all things equals, it&#8217;s more verbose (and less DRY) than RoR.  </p>
<p>If I was coerced into using Python, I&#8217;d most certainly go for Django over TurboGears or web.py.</p>
<p>I was so in love with Python back in the days!<br />
I used to find its syntax cleaner than Ruby which had too many syntactic sugar but Rails changed the game.  It&#8217;s the first framework that leverages its host language to focus on beauty.  Rails just turns all that raw sugar into nicely packaged yummy candies! <img src='http://blog.elisehuard.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As far as scalability is concerned, it&#8217;s an happy problem.  You can always address it by narrowing down the bottlenecks and optimize them.  Hardware is cheap, clean code produced by happy people is priceless.</p>
<p>I like DHH&#8217;s very down to earth approach to tackle performance issues : <a href="http://www.infoq.com/interviews/David-Hansson" rel="nofollow">http://www.infoq.com/interviews/David-Hansson</a></p>
<p>Rails is of course no silverbullet&#8230; it&#8217;s simply the most enjoyable and self-rewarding way to write database-driven web apps at this point in time so let&#8217;s just enjoy it! <img src='http://blog.elisehuard.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

