Land Rat

August 29th, 2010 No comments »

Yesterday was my second time sailing. A friendly coworker is the proud owner of a cruiser-racer hybrid sailboat, which can take a crew of 6. He’s often looking for crew, and as the end of summer is nearing, I thought I’d give it another shot.

First time was a mixed experience. The weather was good, and I enjoyed most of it, but ended the trip thoroughly cold and a little seasick. The sea wind is very efficient at sucking every heat out of you, and I was glad when the day was over.

So this time I came prepared for the cold, I had 3 layers of fleece over normal clothing, a windbreaker, and windbreaker pants. But, foolishly, I didn’t come prepared for seasickness.

The trip started out fine – the weather forecast was not promising, but we actually had a clear sky. The wind was whipping up large waves, and as soon as we left port, the boat started dancing on tall waves – impressive but fun.

The idea was to run a race. Races in that kind of boat means going through a virtual starting line as soon as the starting shot is fired, and doing a few loops around a couple of buoys. The buoys are dynamic so that you need to sail at least one of the legs upwind.

This being a race, the more experienced sailors got to steer and adjust the sails, and I was left playing intelligent counterweight. I listened to anything that sounded like ‘changing tack’ or ‘ready to gipe ?’ and scrambled over to the other side of the boat. Not that simple when you climb over a near featureless expanse of white plastic, and the boat is changing inclination dramatically, and you need to avoid a sail swiping past over your head.

As it was, it was fortunate that I didn’t get to do anything more complex than hanging over the correct side of the boat. About 45 minutes in, my stomach started playing up, and the fun part was over. I learned that seasickness comes in waves, like the sea: you feel steadily worse, until you start retching up (whatever’s left) a few times, and then you get a reprieve for about 10 minutes, until the buildup starts again.

During reprieves, I tried to understand what was going on. Sailing vocabulary takes some translation (starting with bloody ‘left’ and ‘right’, for god’s sake), especially when you have to parse it in two languages (dutch and english). There are many rules, and numbers in knots and degrees. We were at times surrounded by other boats, not that surprising, in a race, and priority was to be observed. Keeping two sails taut and functioning at all times in changing and violent winds also takes a lot of ongoing monitoring and action. A sailboat, like good open source projects, is no democracy, and you quickly understand why that’s necessary.

There’s no graceful way to be seasick. I puked a few times on myself before finding the right way to get everything to go down the side. The upside was that I was showered with brine on a regular basis, so the worst got washed off. Also I hadn’t eaten anything since 6o’clock in the morning, so I was spared anything solid.

I had a major case of cognitive dissonance. I love the idea of sailing, and have wanted to do it for ages. The waves glinting in the sun, the graceful shapes of other sailboats, would normally have me sighing with contentment. As it was, I was feeling way too bad to enjoy it, which felt like a shame, even through the nausea.

As I was hanging there, my feet soaked with seawater, painting Peter’s boat with the contents of my stomach, I reflected on how I could be sitting in my living room reading a good book, with no more movement than the slow, slow sliding of tectonic plates a few miles below. Not having eaten since six, being wet and violently sick left me a shivering wreck, just waiting for it to be over.

There was another unhappy sailor on board, so I was spared being the only one. The skipper ended up taking pity on us and cut the race short. He explained to me that at that point, there weren’t many points to lose anyway. As soon as we hit port and quieter waters, I felt better. I took a shower, changed clothes, and forced down some sandwiches, feeling almost human again. Then I scrubbed whatever traces of sick that were left on the boat.

If I’m allowed back, I’ll give it another try. This time I’ll take the pills, and I’ll wear the many layers, and plastic boots, and I’ll hope the experience will be somewhat more like what I keep imagining it should be. Arrrr.

Sleep Cycle

August 7th, 2010 6 comments »

A few weeks ago, I installed the Sleep Cycle application on my iPhone. The principle of Sleep Cycle: you start up the application. You indicate at what time you need to be up. Then you put your iPhone (in plane mode, to minimize radiation) next to your pillow before bed. The same kind of application exists for Android.
The application works with the iPhone’s accelerometer recording the movements of the mattress. At the end of the night you get a recording, with some interpretation, like so.
Went to bed / woke up: 23:25 / 06:31
Total time: 7h 06m

It wakes you up when you’re starting to emerge, based on your movements, in the half hour interval preceding the alarm time you set.
Of course, the nerd in me was absolutely fascinated at first. In theory, you could check which kind of sleep would correspond to which state of mind the next day, and it’s just fun. And if it worked, it could make waking up just that little bit easier.

After a while, however, i got frustrated.
First off, in dream state (REM sleep) you don’t move, in theory. It’s only a short time anyway, and during that time just your eyes move, rapidly, as the name indicates.
Secondly, you have sleep cycles of about 3 hours at a time. Deep sleep, REM, deep sleep. A night having about 6 of them couldn’t be right. Errata: sleep cycles are actually 1h30 to 2h30
Thirdly, the smart alarm thing didn’t seem to work. Sometimes, I would wake up, check the time, without the alarm being activated.

And mostly, the moral aspect. It did make me that little bit more anxious. Without the application, I would just get up, and drag myself to the shower, no questions asked. With Sleep Cycle, the first thing I’d do was look at the previous night, and try to divine whether I’d actually slept well, looking at the statistics. Being a bit disgruntled when there was a lot of movement, and trying to decide whether it was something I’d eaten.

So I decided to give it up. There’s a whole movement out there about monitoring your own vitals. It’s understandable, we like control. But I’m starting to think that maybe, it’s wiser to just live, without anything telling us how we ought to feel.

35

August 4th, 2010 9 comments »

I’m 35 today. I’ve not been looking forward to it, to be honest, but time dragged me by the scruff of the neck, and here I am.

At 35, one can no longer pretend to be a young adult, and it’s the slide into the Middle Ages.

I still don’t feel very grown up.
I’m braver than I used to be, but also more cowardly in some ways.
I’m more cynical than in my twenties, but people manage to surprise me quite often (in a good way).
I’m starting to know my limits.
I still have trouble showing affection, or asking for help.
I’ve loved and been loved, but I don’t know whether it’ll happen.
Friends and acquaintances have showed me by example that a family is still possible at this point.
I’m loving my job, but I know it will need to evolve, it’s just not clear how.
I’ve come to terms with the fact that life is never going to be constant bliss, but a succession of good and bad times.

In short, I thought I’d have it all worked out by now, but I’m still casting about … I guess that’s life.

Ziploc bags in my drawer

August 1st, 2010 1 comment »

I’ve been traveling a bit too much recently.
Currency and travel

Other highlights from NY

June 26th, 2010 No comments »

A week has gone since I’m back, but the highlights anyway:

  • the day I spent biking in NY. Good to know: there’s a bike path going all round Manhattan. I started off in the lower east village, took that bike path, rounded the coast along Battery Park, biked a little bit on the Hudson Highway (not great), and then crossed over onto the Hudson Trail, which goes all the way up. The first bit is not really scenic, with mostly warehouses and underpasses, but then the bike path becomes lined with grass and trees.
    I could have gone the same way back, but where would have been the fun in that ? So I went into the city, biked in Central park, and crossed my way down from there. I even biked through Time Square (which is on one of the bike paths). It actually felt safer than doing it in Brussels ! The streets are wider, the drivers marginally saner, and in some streets there are separate bike lanes. The main problem comes from pedestrians, who see the bike lanes as a convenient extension of the sidewalk. In Time Square, where there are throngs or people, this becomes a hazard.
  • Katz’s Deli: pretty well-known, mentioned in guides, and justly so. It’s a folksy place, with lots of pictures on the wall, as far from hip as you can possibly be. But they have great pastrami. I ordered a pastrami sandwich on rye bread, which came with pickles. The pastrami was warm, salty, juicy and delicious, the pickles were a nice green crunchy counterpoint (and they were salty too, not vinegared).
  • In one of my wanders, I passed a place called ‘The Doughnut Plant of New York‘. It didn’t look like much, just a counter, but there was a queue of people looking like addicts waiting for their fix. 10 minutes later, I knew why: doughnuts that literally melt in your mouth. That day I had lavendar and mango. I had no choice but to come back the next day: I had a carrot cake doughnut and a creme brulee doughnut.
  • In the ‘good beer pub’ category, the Blind Tiger is pretty decent. They had a Great Divide event going when I was there, so I didn’t feel like I’d wasted my time.
  • The MoMa and the Guggenheim. The MoMa is in a fantastic modernist building, and the collections are unique. If you ever wondered how Mondrian got to his square thing, or what stages Picasso went through, or what kind of work led Pollock to his drips, you can see the it displayed there. They had a temporary exhibition on Henry Cartier-Bresson, with fantastic pictures from his whole career. Where the MoMa is more 20th century, the Guggenheim has a foot in the 21st, and displays more conceptual artists as well as the ones we know. Interesting if a bit more demanding.
  • The Radio City Music Hall: it doesn’t look like much from the outside, but it’s Art Deco extravaganza by Rockefeller on the inside. There are guided tours, and ours was excellent, extravagantly gay and obviously into the whole broadway scene. The ceilings are actually gold plated (24carat), the light fixtures are amazing, everything is carefully preserved. It’s like a step on the movie set of a 30s pulp movie.

There, if you were wondering what to do next time you’re in the big apple (not likely).

I heart NY

June 16th, 2010 No comments »

Last time I was in New York, I was 23, and with one of my best friends. We had both participated to an exchange program with an obscure college in Missouri, had lived abroad for the first time, had lots of fun, met many interesting people, fallen in young love (with other people), and had a happy time of it.

After the three months in Missouri, New York felt like back to civilization – proper cheese and proper bread, art, culture, and the tremendous liveliness of the place. I felt in love instantly, and told myself I would live in Manhattan for a while someday.

This time I’m 34, and on my own. I’m no closer to living in New York than I was then, maybe even farther away. So I was a bit apprehensive coming here – would the city be less attractive through the eyes of the person I had become ?

At first it seemed that way – my hotel in Chinatown right next to the train tracks, the smells of the overheated town …
But then I took a walk, and I felt the attraction again. What mostly makes the charm of NY city is the crowd. Ever moving, ever changing, always something to see. It’s 30 levels of people compressed into one level of street.

And of course, the monumental city forming the scene for all this human comedy. I took a swim through the crowds of Times Square, Central Park, Fifth Avenue …

On tuesday I started from Greenwich Village and walked through Soho. Greenwich Village has a certain amount of contrived charm, with chess tables on small crowded streets. Soho is a shopping district with nice architecture.

Then I walked over Brooklyn Bridge to Brooklyn. Last time I only criss-crossed Manhattan, so I’d promised myself to see Brooklyn (and maybe Queens).

Brooklyn has a very different feel from vibrant Manhattan. It’s clearly a more residential neighborhood. The streets are narrower and greener, the brownstone houses well kept, more children in the streets. The walk along the coast facing Manhattan affords a nice view of the financial district, but Brooklyn Heights itself is worth a wander, too.

Then, since the weather was fantastic, warm with a sea breeze, I piled on the sunscreen and went to see Coney Island. I took a long subway ride to get there, through nondescript apartment block country.

Coney Island is described in terms going from ‘tacky’ to ’seedy’. They’re not wrong. You get off the subway and you’re at the entrance of an old-fashioned theme park, with great wheel and rides and everything.

The theme park transitions smoothly to beach, the beach being lined with many multicolored stands selling drinks and foods.

The beach itself is nice and sandy. While I had a lot of fun photographing the extreme kitch, I did enjoy spending a few hours lying in the sand with a book. One can only absorb so much city. Something can be said for having a beach so close to home.

Back in Manhattan I concluded the evening by going to an Ukrainian restaurant, ending beautifully with a lethal piece of cheesecake.

Now tell me, what’s not to love ?

Baltimore and Washington

June 14th, 2010 2 comments »

Update: thanks Mark for the soundtrack :)

I’ve been slacking off on the blog front, I know.
The truth is that the last few months my life has been pretty much dominated by the fact that I was going to speak at a few conferences, which is still a pretty big deal for me. That and some deadlines have kept my mind otherwise occupied.

But I’m on holiday (yay), so it’s time to pick up the thread !
Last week I came to Baltimore for Railsconf. Baltimore, Maryland is a sizable city about 100km away from Washington. It used to be one of the most important ports of the US, and a large naval base. It has the largest colored population of all US cities.

I was staying downtown, where the conference was also taking place, in a district of mostly uninspired high rises. My first impression was not very favorable – downtown Baltimore seeming fairly lacking in personality.

I visited a fairly crazy museum: American Visionary Art, which displays art by people who 1. have had no training 2. have a screw loose in one of many ways. In a strange way, when they have religious vision, or in a good way, when they’re freedom activists, or in a conventional ways, when they make giant pink poodles or steam liners made out of tooth picks. There was an excellent little collection of automata and I had a great time pushing the buttons to see them in motion.

My first perception of Baltimore changed when locals took us out of that center and to midtown, where you have elegant old brick houses, and an active night life.
The same goes to Fell’s point, which is a picturesque (to the point of theme park-ness) little square with bars and shops. The houses here were small brick houses, with the feel of an old worker’s neighborhood. Those places (and the very decent foods and beers) changed my perception somewhat.

Still, the city gives an impression of fragility. 2 streets away from Fell’s point, you arrive in a wasteland of abandoned warehouses. People told me expressly not to wander off, to make sure I knew where I was going.
Even in the more affluent neighborhoods, many people, predominantly black, idle about, eyes vacant. An impression of apathy. One of my fellow conference goers told me that he saw many crack addicts (since I don’t know the signs, I can only believe him).

So yes, mixed impressions from Baltimore. The weather was hot and muggy for a few days, then a storm cleared up the air and it was fresher for a few days.

After Railsconf I took the train to Washington. Washington, the seat of power – the center (‘The Mall’) all done in neoclassicist style, clearly wanted to style itself the new Rome. As tasteful and understated as those things usually are, propaganda made out of steel and concrete.

Still, you have to admire the fact that they made a number of monumental museums right there between the Capitol and the White House, free for all. Not only is that great by itself, but it’s also an expression of the will to share the plenty with everyone.

The weather stayed very hot my whole stay – constant sweating and diving into coffee shops along the way for a breath of cooled air and frappuccino’s, smoothies of ice coffees to lower the body temperature.

I walked around the Mall the first day – it’s monumental, and it honestly takes an hour to walk it end to end. At night I joined up with the only other Belgians I met at Railsconf for a meal.

The next day I saw some of the Natural History Museum, fossils, dinosaurs and meteors !
I joined with the other Belgians to see the Flight and Space Museum, which is a little child’s dream, full of restored planes and rockets from all stages of human flight. We even did a round on the flight simulator, which was fun, though it made me understand why fighter jet pilots need to be realy fit – 3 minutes being shaken and turned upside down takes some energy out of you, and that’s without the stress of a real mission.

After that I walked off to Dupont Circle, which is another neighborhood, completely different from the stately downtown. Its a leafy residential neighborhood, with a distinct aura of hipness.

Then I joined a friend at a barbeque of one of his friends in GeorgeTown. Georgetown is also very much on the hip end of the spectrum, lots of shops and activity on saturday night, everything in fake old brick houses.

The crowd at the barbecue was quite cosmopolitan – you realize that Washington really is a pole of attraction. There were people working with NASA, World Bank, WHO, NATO, but all very clearly in their off time and having fun. Nice crowd.

Next day I walked all over Washington, visiting Chinatown, seeing the National Portrait Gallery (nice, funny how art can sometimes cheer you up), walked again to Dupont Circle where I had coffee with my friend.

Washington’s metro and I didn’t gel at all. Washington has the subway of the future – grey, clean, uniform. And very low light, it’s a bit as if you’re walking in a boring black and white nightmare. London and New York’s subways are more my cup of tea, hubristic, chaotic, slightly dirty concrete and tile.

After that I continued my sweaty walk up Embassy Row, where most embassies are located. This was yet another category of neighborhood, mansions with leafy gardens emulating many different styles, dog walkers, joggers.

I ended the day by going to Ben’s Chilli Bowl, in a more popular neighborhood – an old-fashioned fast food with a loud and cheerful crowd, and good chili.

I noticed back at home that not only had I a nice collection of blisters, but the top skin of my feet was burned raw red. Oh well.

Today, I’m on my way to New York for a few days. As I’m writing this, I’m sitting in a comfy, air conditioned Amtrak train. I’m looking forward to seeing New York again – it’s been a long while.

The Rant Switch

April 25th, 2010 9 comments »

furry conventionIt was a dark and stormy night … *cough*

I call certain subjects Rant Switches. When these subjects are broached in my presence, I feel a rant bubbling up, and it takes some effort to keep it in. Tirades against the limitations of humanity in general, and about those subjects in paricular.

Belgian community squabbles – flemish against walloons – have long belonged to those subjects. Right now, the BHV crisis is so incredibly absurd that I’m almost speechless. So a small part of the population would need to vote for one subgroup of our poor excuse for a political class instead of another subgroup ? Who Bloody Cares ? Don’t we have anything more important to think about, like the country’s national debt, its administrative sclerosis, unemployment, etc, etc ? Really ?

And don’t get me started on the burqa ban.
Why ban burqas (head to toe islamic veil for women): reasons given:

  • a terrorist could be hiding under it and video cameras couldn’t identify them
  • to free women from fundamentalist control.

By this reasoning, large sunglasses, wigs, carnival costumes don’t really enhance facial recognition either. Hell, furry conventions or goth meetups are out of the question. While we’re at it, by law we should be obliged to present our faces at the best possible angle when passing a surveillance camera. Anyone see any problem here ?

O wait, it’s in the name of security. Why are you protesting against that ? That’s suspect, no ? Do you, or any of your friend, have any connections to subversive groups ? We need to datamine all your conversations, and take you in for questioning, it’s a matter of state security.

The second reason is even more laughable: free islamic women ? First off, do they want to be freed ? Has anyone asked burqa-wearing women if they wanted to throw off the cloth ? It may be equivalent to asking them to walk around in their bras, for all we know.
And if it’s a matter of oppression – do you really think that forbidding women to cover themselves will help them ? In all probability, if they couldn’t leave the house without their burqa, now, they won’t be able to leave the house at all.

And oh, there’s the small matter of antagonizing parts of a large belgian community. It’s in effect saying ‘you are not welcome here’. Bully behaviour. It’s not by singling out one group and imposing a ban, that anything, at all, will be helped.

Bravo, I say. Pat yourselves on the back. You, who we voted for, have really made our country a better place. We were known for our pedophilic incidents, let’s also be known for ground-breaking stupidity.

breathe in, breathe out … OK, I’ve got it back under control. Carry on.

Nazi Orks and Communist Emperors

March 30th, 2010 7 comments »

When authors have complete power over the world they create, as is the case in fantasy and science fiction, their beliefs and opinions shape their work in a more or less obvious way.

This has been clear to me for some time, but I was reminded again when reading the ‘Sword of Truth’ saga of Terry Goodkind. I decided to have a look around in my collection, and try and extract who thinks what.

Some are just minding their character’s business, or try to use their imagination without imprinting their own vision in any obvious way, so it’s sometimes subtle. This is a Good Thing – I don’t really appreciate being bludgeoned with misc propaganda while I’m trying to enjoy a story.

  • Starting with the freshest: Terry Goodkind. Not difficult: cold war stuff. The bad guys are evil communists, with a dollop of religion on top. He sings the praise of individual enterprise and freedom all through most of the last 5 books (yawn).
  • Another sadly obvious one: Lukyanenko (The Night Watch). Russian patriot – the rest of the world is tired, old and decadent. Russia is sharp and young, rejection of foreign concepts and imports, and glorification of russian traditions (like drinking vodka and eating salami or pickled onion, which happens a lot).
  • Orson Scott Card: I had to read about it to realize it, but the guy is a convinced mormon. This was mostly clear from the way his characters never have biblical knowledge of eachother before marriage, and then proceed to have as many children as possible. Also pretty right wing, but again, this was harder to parse in his books.
  • Philip Pullman. Again, trying to make a point by telling a story. The point was made in bright shining neon letters
  • I suspect Terry Pratchet from being rather left wing, he has lots of sympathy for common folks, and kings, dukes and whatnot don’t exactly get preferential treatment.
  • Tolkien: Kings and queens, princes, and elves. Based on saga, so he has a solid excuse, although that hasn’t kept some from accusing him of being rather sharply on the right. And hobbits save the day.
  • J.K. Rowling: also more on the left side of the spectrum. The rich and powerful are rather unpleasant all through Harry Potter.
  • Katherine Kerr: right-wing, I think, like most romantic visions are, really. Nibelungen and all that, you know the drill.
  • Robin Hobb: in the same category as Katherine Kerr
  • Robert R.R. Martin: more of the same. That doesn’t keep me from really liking his books, if he would only finally go and finish the Song of Ice and FIre.
  • China Mieville: left wing, I think, with his fantastic vision of a revolutionary messiah going down in flames.

Neal Stephenson, William Gibson, Robert Charles Darwin, Iain Banks are all more difficult to make out, with people being people in all walks of life. So basically, the best authors are less obvious …

Of course, this is all my perception. I’d be curious to know what you think ? Do you have other obvious examples ? (I probably forgot a few)

The pervert

February 19th, 2010 8 comments »

A good few months ago – it was summer – I was coming home from a night out in Antwerp, and arrived at Brussels Midi station. From there, I went down the stairs to the underground tram station, as I usually do.

As I stood on the quay, slightly tipsy, waiting and thinking about this and that, a man who was sitting on the red plastic seats asked me ‘Do you speak English ?’ He was nondescript, medium-build, medium-height, white ironed shirt and black trousers, and a small suitcase, black eyes in a vaguely rodent-like face.

As I do, I answered that I did. He proceeded.
‘Brussels is a very open-minded city’.
‘Alright ?’ I never thought of Brussels as particularly open-minded, but I consider open-mindedness to be a good thing, so I was rather flattered on behalf of my city.
‘yes, you’ve got these clubs’
Uncomprehending stare.
‘Clubs where people are naked, and you have these orgies, where you have mountains of naked people’ wide-eyed enthusiasm.
‘Oh’ Slightly taken aback, but pushed into the role of the open-minded citizen.

My tram arrived, and I got on. To my annoyance, he followed me, and sat in my vicinity. He continued to talk to me.

‘yes, these clubs that are absolutely amazing’ he continued.
‘and you know, I’m actually a <insert really weird fetish here>. You know what that means ?’
I didn’t. So he proceeded to explain.
In detail. With the same smiling enthusiasm, and I started to suspect that the suitcase he was holding firmly on his lap was there for a reason.
‘but that’s not very hygienic’ I interjected weakly as some point, ever open-minded.

When he finished his explanation, he moved on to ‘you’ve got a very nice, open face. ‘
I was a bit tongue-tied at that one, the situation very clearly outside the parameters of my education.
‘You really have a nice, open face. Could I have your phone number ?’
And he reached and patted my arm.

At that, my brainstem reacted violently and I suddenly found myself teleported 3 meters away from the guy.
‘Look’ i told him, still civil, I think, ‘ you are way out of my comfort zone. I’m not interested at all’.
Fortunately, we arrived at my stop, and I could escape. Which I did, nearly running.
For some reason, I felt like cleaning myself with a steel brush and liberal doses of bleach, especially my arm.

I’ve had the opportunity since to ponder this event.

First off, the guy approached the situation like a perfect little salesman. From the ‘do you speak english’ to the rest of the conversation, it’s text-book sales stuff. What he was selling was absolutely unappealing to me. But I think he probably got part of his satisfaction out of the process.

Secondly, sex is really on the dark side of the mind. We have absolutely no control over what turns us on. In fact, what excites us is absolutely independent of morals, principles or esthetics (proof in the sad case of pedophiles). It’s often linked to the forbidden, and that’s why a lot of people would never even imagine to express their most private fantasies, even to their partners.

One thing we do have control over, is our course of action. The only morally acceptable way is to have partners who agree completely with what we’re up to.

This guy was definitely toeing the line with his approach, by talking in graphical terms about his kink. A bit like phone sex but on an unsuspecting stranger. Not rape, not exhibition either, but still firmly in indecent exposure territory.

A week ago, I was again coming home through Midi station – same time, same place.
I was walking on the tram quay, when I heard to my left
‘Do you speak english ?’
And yes, it was the same guy. A bit less closely shaven, gray stubble accentuating the rodent aspect.
I answered firmly: no, and walked on.